| Multimedia Book Report Rubric (Fiction) |
| Use with any multimedia book review. |
(May be duplicated for classroom use as long as no fee is charged
and MidLink Magazine http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/ is cited as the source.) |
| Points |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
| Title Card or Screen |
No title page |
Title page is present, but lacks much of the required information |
Title page is present but lacks complete information |
Title page is present and contains title, author, students' names, and appropriate graphics. |
|
| Main Characters |
No description of main characters |
Incomplete or inadequate description of main characters |
Adequate descriptions and character sketches of main characters including a few comparisons among characters |
Complete description of main characters including comparisons, contrasts, and complete character sketches |
|
| Setting |
No description of setting |
Incomplete or inaccurate description of setting |
Adequate description of setting including a few visual aids |
Complete description of setting. Includes many drawings, maps, and background information |
|
| Brief Summary |
Inadequate plot summary |
Incomplete plot summary and incomplete or inaccurate story board |
Adequate plot summary including some events on a story board |
Complete plot summary including story board highlighting major events |
|
| Turning Point |
No mention of turning point |
Inaccurate or incomplete description of turning point |
Accurate description of turning point with some reference to contributing events |
Complete, accurate description of turning point and events leading to it |
|
| Outcomes |
No description of outcome |
Inaccurate or incomplete description of outcome |
Accurate description of most outcomes |
Complete, accurate description of important outcomes |
|
| Originality |
The work is a minimal plot summary. There is no evidence of new thought. |
The work is merely a basic summary of the plot. There is no evidence of new thought, inventiveness, or insight. |
The product shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the content and extends beyond that to offer new insights and understanding of the novel. |
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and accurate reading comprehension. |
|
| Student Recommendation |
No recommendation |
No justification for recommendation |
Adequate justification for recommendation |
Convincing, reasonable justification for recommendation |
|
| Slide or Card Design |
Confusing, irrelevant, distracting use of graphics, sound, and text |
Graphics and text are somewhat purposeful, but many are unrelated to content |
Graphics, sounds, and text are purposeful and most are logically related to content |
Purposeful, logical flow of graphics, sound, and text to convey relevant content |
|
| Oral Presentation |
No eye contact, voice too low to be heard, poor tone and style |
Little eye contact, poor voice projection, tone, and style |
Adequate eye contact, voice projection, tone, and style |
Excellent eye contact, voice projection, pleasing tone, and engaging style |
|
| Group Work |
No teamwork, poor classroom behavior, failed to meet deadlines and project requirements |
Poor teamwork, some misbehavior, sometimes late for deadlines and project requirements |
Some teamwork, little misbehavior, met most deadlines and project requirements |
Excellent teamwork, good behavior, worked together to meet all deadlines and project requirements |
|
| Grading Scale |
A=40-44
B=35-39 |
C=25-34
D=20-24 |
 |
Total Points: |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.